In this section we invite you to share your thoughts on the article. You can also find the peer reviews and the response of the editorial committee, which may provide inspiration for your comments.
In this debate section we welcome contributions – in any format – on the content and the form of the publication. There are three ways to share your voice (by name or anonymously) and comment on the article:
1. Use the inline comments (the plus signs) next to each paragraph or below each page to comment.
2. Use the contact form to share your thoughts.
3. Mail us your comments at info@bridginghumanities.com.
The first is shown directly, the second and third will be published here after approval of the editorial committee.
We look forward to hearing from you.
The review process
In June 2018 the draft version of the publication was reviewed by two experts. This post includes the reviews as well as a response of the editorial committee. Main issues concerned were: the added value of co-creation, interpretation of the film essay (pamphlet), navigation, inclusion of audiovisual media, inovatiness of concluding statements, and input of Indonesian voices.
An embodied, multivocal story of a tradition of protest
An extensive review of the publication by Henk Molenaar, former secretary of the Dutch National Research Agenda. In his review he typifies the publication an an embodied, multivocal story of a tradition of protest, and questions if it leads to new, or a different type of, knowledge. With regard to role of the journal and the editors in relation to authors and reviewers he advises the editors he advises for deeper reflection and more transparency on the process, also from the side of the editors.